Monday, August 6, 2007

a culture of indifference

This afternoon, I happen to read a blogpost by a journalism student. This certain post talked about the current state of the Philippine Collegian (Kule). He narrated that when he was asked by the publisher of the Philippine Daily Inquirer how the Kule was, his first reaction was to say that the publication is "too progressive".

"Critical of the nation's leader[s]", he criticizes the Kule for failing to give "updates on what's happening in school". Moreover, he posits that being the official publication of the university, it only represents a "small percentage of the entire UP community". He goes on further to the conclusion that the editors of three years ago are definitely a lot better, as they had at least showed "hint[s] of decency".

He ends his post by saying that "sometimes we are too immersed with ideals that we fail to see what is real" and that it is "no wonder not many journalism students are interested to join the Collegian".

Dismay is an understatement of what I felt after I had read the post.

For one thing, the Journalism Department itself teaches the students to be critical of the nation's leaders, of the policies they make, and the current situation of the country for one mere reason, it is a responsibility of journalists to the public. In simple terms, communication theories call it "watchdogs". To ask for updates, pardon me for saying, is very high school. There's a big difference between the two.

However, given that argument, I believe the Kule never failed to give updates on the current situation of the college, as it even publishes the statements of the students councils on the issues that the university is facing. It has not failed to air the eviction of tambayans in CMC. What this student might be looking for is the UP administration's side, something the Kule has attempted but the admin completely ignores.

To question idealism is to question the very principles that is taught in our department. It is this idealism that has developed ethical and news standards. It is this idealism that graduates aim for the best, for a change in the system as they see the reality in our society. It is this idealism that has taught students to look beyond the fame, the money and work on the very essence of journalism itself, a public service, a responsibility to the citizens of this nation. To question idealism is to entertain a culture of indifference, a shame in this profession.

In an interview, my uncle said, "If I had known that Journalism would be defined such as it is today, I wouldn't have entered Journalism in the first place."

At first, I didn't quite understand why he was able to say such things, as if he has lost hope of the future generation of journalists.

After reading a post written by his former students, I hate to admit that he might be right after all.

* not so convincing noh? ako rin, nahihirapan sabihin. abangan kung bakit *

7 comments:

  1. er, sabi mo sa footnote abangan kung bakit ahehe

    ReplyDelete
  2. grabe nga, ang harsh niya... nasaktan nga ako... nalimutan nila na ang kule ay alternatibong porma ng publikasyon at nilalabas nito hindi ang "seemingly popular views" kung hindi ang mga balitang hinfi mo matatagpuan sa mainstream media...

    ReplyDelete
  3. desi, hindi ko na naalala. in fairness.

    hehe. short term memory lost

    bading, asan na yung formula mo? penge copy ulet para matapos na ang ating "thesis".

    ReplyDelete
  4. well, friend, kapatid na aleya, ganyan talaga kasaklap ang buhay. akala natin lahat tama tayo pero nalilimutan natin na may iba't ibang perspektibo para tingnan ang iba't ibang sitwasyon.

    napaisip tuloy ako. sino ang immersed sa ideals nila? tayong lumalaban para sa pagbabago? o sila na nalilimutan tumingin sa mata ng ibang tao?

    contradicting arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. *dugo galing ilong*

    tagalog please :/ haha

    ReplyDelete